Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call [draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse]

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 04 October 2016 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC30B12943A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKBAXzBs0lei for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 248C4124281 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31025 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2016 19:22:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Oct 2016 19:22:57 -0000
Date: 4 Oct 2016 19:22:37 -0000
Message-ID: <20161004192237.15135.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJrgF3w-=0e8XbBLbDNPN9Nyuw15WS7AcZO5LbzBLKR8A@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/byRflFowOtpK4HsfZdq_ER-K3_I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call [draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 19:23:03 -0000

>Yup, my view (as can probably be guessed!) is that doing this for
>negative answers is the important bit, and that wildcard synthesis was
>easy to add while we had the hood open (see "shipwright's disease",
>which I suffer from greatly[0]). Seeing as the large majority of the
>discussion has been about the negative answers, I'm going to remove
>the wildcard text.
>
>*Please* WG, let me know if you'd rather that we keep it...

I'd rather you keep it.

My specific use case is IPv6 DNSBLs, where it'll typically list an
entire /64.

R's,
John