Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 04 July 2017 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B02131490; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAustTeXrJ3c; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 854B013148B; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1dSOGa-0000kc-Pe; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:53:24 +0000
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 15:53:24 +0200
Message-ID: <m2podgxq97.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, dnsop@ietf.org, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <A70FD34B-000A-4748-B1B2-BF6DF66C7D6C@fugue.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com> <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com> <F98FEA1C-3F3F-4344-8B07-996AAD899CC2@fugue.com> <m2shicxr0h.wl-randy@psg.com> <A70FD34B-000A-4748-B1B2-BF6DF66C7D6C@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bzi7Gktuta5dTxQtWTFxvFF6QJw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:53:28 -0000

>> how depressing.  one obvious curiousity is who asked the one-sided
>> question?  otoh, maybe i don't want to know.  but i wish you had
>> perceived a wider responsibility to the community.
> 
> It was discussed at length in the working group, so I would say that
> you could In principle have raised this concern sooner.  However, I
> will admit that it didn’t occur to me to do so either. In any case, it
> really is a separate issue from that covered by this draft, and so
> there’s no reason why we can’t do this work if you think it’s worth
> doing. Given the situation with ICANN and GTLD, it may be moot, but I
> wouldn’t mind writing it down.

we really should not cover our eyes when we send in the assassins.

i would offer to put my keyboard where my mouth is.  but i fear that, at
the bottom, i would have the unreasonable desire for dns classes to
support these kinds of things.  i.e. i don't think we have a clean fix.
but it would be nice to document the good with the bad.

randy