Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points
John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 15 April 2020 21:32 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C86C3A088E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=fTZaclin; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=ErlSXj+X
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s1AL5ST7NwvU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41CA63A0888 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9142 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2020 21:32:48 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=23b3.5e977d80.k2004; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=5Q24YgP/DWkHFjTDnTVTSuXkTHWZUNjgYsBY1k4y0pg=; b=fTZaclinUnCkmKWRqR4Xm+pkApt9gFC+aK7PfVwuibUCurnAe8l8yudhOG+AC7GxGhsOkBHi0fHlJY3/Z7LH8tcik/o1J9yZgoEekrQFntKC8SuMZIRAZxQnB7KDSbRbzfpl6FYhz+gywd9Sy+1pYE4iIiT3Duo0T+ceyaXKQGCDfoZ2d3AyyOEsnaV1iK9G80MBepfkdygSy7dKp03c9JvyPkMewR4pOpLLRtPVS2P/VJfJuW1rKYKVvnoq38u0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=23b3.5e977d80.k2004; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=5Q24YgP/DWkHFjTDnTVTSuXkTHWZUNjgYsBY1k4y0pg=; b=ErlSXj+XFS1j7L76ePC2QhiIrlKsar6evSCVgFRtkizjWniMgR6T7EVdoDhSQsft7glOjv55cD64qmmeyp2suBrw5xxzQ4Ucxp0uYaKWK5JXd+XtZkXOxnaTbR4cxdbP/qh4//ygl7zx23zxy0mv7z9NIqkfVagH2mE+E2/UsS2EFtdsweOm7d5Av/ZDwgLx5ww27yAoPlMcHdbaDekt5/o9PGtREbMkOkUzLbnxFqCmh4MKV1f+EUONNTee+OEt
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 15 Apr 2020 21:32:48 -0000
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:32:48 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2004151730030.21438@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4826305.IS1iOAaquJ@linux-9daj>
References: <20200415151620.DD2EE17A8967@ary.qy> <4826305.IS1iOAaquJ@linux-9daj>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (OSX 407 2020-02-09)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/c0oP8AKMLWwan_u24rKnN4Q0b7U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 21:32:52 -0000
>> The plan in this draft is that NS2 would eventually replace NS records. > > if so there's a much larger set of changes we'd have to consider. for one > thing NS2 should be slabbed (one record containing a compound rdata set); for > another it would have to incorporate what DS does now (also as a slab). Take a look at draft-tapril-ns2-00 in which NS2 has ten subfields including one for the DS or DNSKEY. Like I said, it's very kitchen-sinky. > this still doesn't feel like the right era to begin the DNSv2 effort. I wouldn't disagree. I understand the motivation to have some way to say above the cut whether the below-cut NS speak DoT or DoH or whatever, but this is way more than that. Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points Ralf Weber
- [DNSOP] data at delegation points Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points Ralf Weber
- [DNSOP] NS2/NS2T proper locations Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] NS2/NS2T proper locations John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] data at delegation points John R Levine