IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis

Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de> Mon, 01 July 2024 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <florian+ietf@narrans.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300E2C169408; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 01:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JTO5h8gpCTyu; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 01:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.narrans.de (michelangelo.narrans.de [IPv6:2001:19f0:6c01:821:5400:1ff:fe33:a36d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2167C151066; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 01:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by michelangelo.narrans.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d74e4d1d (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:28:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EGh2N8tssBRskH=PVXV1e1eON4z=8E1JWPypNUyZVwLg@mail.gmail.com> (Tim Wicinski's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:32:59 -0400")
References: <CADyWQ+EGh2N8tssBRskH=PVXV1e1eON4z=8E1JWPypNUyZVwLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 10:28:51 +0200
Message-ID: <m1ikxp348s.fsf@narrans.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-ID-Hash: DS2KP6X6GW2F3LF7APBBDBHDNLYUCQCP
X-Message-ID-Hash: DS2KP6X6GW2F3LF7APBBDBHDNLYUCQCP
X-MailFrom: florian+ietf@narrans.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/cDMsFjkGTngAeU--hQCRK3gAK4o>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

I did the dnsdir early review of -00, all my nits have been addressed.
As a root server operator I don't see anything wrong with the document,
not that it would effect me...

I think it's good to go to be published as an RFC.
-- 
In my defence, I have been left unsupervised.

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status