Re: [DNSOP] List conduct

[Paul Vixie <[e-mail]>]

Masataka Ohta wrote on 2022-04-22 05:30:
> Paul Vixie wrote:
>>> such destructive statements as
> 
>>> IPv6 with unnecessarily lengthy 16B addresses without valid
>>> technical reasoning only to make network operations prohibitively
>>> painful is a garbage protocol.
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> LISP, which perform ID to locator mapping, which is best performed
>>> by DNS, in a lot less scalable way than DNS is a garbage protocol.
>>>
>>> is protected by "the freedom of speech" and is not
>>> "unprofessional" and is fully acceptable.
> ...
>> the above snippets in which ipv6 and lisp are designated "garbage 
>> protocols" have a productivity error in that neither is actionable.
> 
> Action by IETF becomes possible only after some IETF consensus
> is reached, which is obviously impossible for poor IPv6 and
> LISP, because there are certain amount of people disparately
> acting for them.

here, you demonstrate a commitment to nonconstructive commentary 
("obviously impossible for poor IPv6 and LISP") and thus end my 
participation in this thread. this is invective not argumentation and 
i'll have no part in it. my reaction may be typical, in which case you 
could infer much from the silence of others.

ohta-san, i will not permanently lose hope that you can learn to 
associate constructively with your protocol development peers. but i 
will continue to take months-long or years-long breaks to regenerate 
such hope after each demonstration by you of nonconstructive and 
unprofessional behaviour.

i support the actions of the co-chairs since they have acted within the 
intent of the rules even if loopholes could be found by the motivated.

-- 
P Vixie