Re: [DNSOP] DNS-in-JSON draft

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 05 September 2016 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABD712B3CC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 03:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9qcsUxPLzqOr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 03:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B625712B3C1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 03:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:44682) by ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1bgr3A-000a6k-fe (Exim 4.86_36-e07b163) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Mon, 05 Sep 2016 11:22:48 +0100
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 11:22:48 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160905154737.5a1c67e5@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1609051121080.28546@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <DB336274-A631-471E-8277-D6690A87C834@vpnc.org> <20160905154737.5a1c67e5@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/cU2CKsDkT4SnfqnvdARj_szmHfk>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS-in-JSON draft
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 10:22:54 -0000

Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
>
> It occurs to me that maybe we want an option to have arrays of RRset
> instead of arrays of RRs?

If you do that, how do you represent the covering signature(s)?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
South Utsire, East Forties: Southerly 4, increasing 5 or 6. Slight or
moderate. Mainly fair. Good, occasionally poor later.