Re: [DNSOP] Draft -domain-names-01

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

I think the dicussion of names is useful and insightful.

we can find a home for it I'm pretty sure but I'm happy to see
discussion of it.

joel

On 11/3/15 4:39 PM, Tim WIcinski wrote:
> 
> I spoke to Ed this morning during breakfast, and we discussed his
> draft.  I do like this as a well written read through the history of
> namespace and domains, but I feel (and I think Ed even would agree) this
> is not so much a DNSOP document, but something that should be in an area
> where they need a better understanding of DNS (*cough* appsawg *cough*).
> 
> How does the working group think of this?
> 
> thanks
> tim
> 
> On 10/30/15 8:23 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
>> A while back I floated a draft across this mail list and got (what I
>> think) is sufficient (perhaps not the right word) feedback from the WG.  I
>> updated the document and resubmitted.  FWIW, this is the document link:
>>         https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-domain-names-01
>>
>> I'm not even asking for comment on the list (but you can if you want).
>> When I rev'd the document, I didn't mention it on this list (until now).
>>
>> What I'm asking for is - when in Yokohama, if you have an interest in this
>> I'm willing to discuss.
>>
>> The issue in the document is both internal to DNS and external to DNS, I'm
>> looking for broader input (such as applications area topics).
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>