Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Re: Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol

Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> Wed, 11 November 2009 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <fweimer@bfk.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BC33A68B3 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:34:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.764
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.764 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.485, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44cROzT19zD8 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx01.bfk.de (mx01.bfk.de [193.227.124.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129AE3A6889 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx00.int.bfk.de ([10.119.110.2]) by mx01.bfk.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1N89bI-00073s-HV; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:34:52 +0100
Received: by bfk.de with local id 1N89bI-0007CS-Cx; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:34:52 +0000
To: Duane Wessels <wessels@dns-oarc.net>
References: <200911041858.TAA24009@TR-Sys.de> <FD44BF39-5B62-4689-AC6D-8DFFAF340EA1@icsi.berkeley.edu> <20091104192634.GA31981@vacation.karoshi.com.> <d791b8790911041141k71066fa9nede54d5dff9394fa@mail.gmail.com> <AF9E632C-C470-4EA8-9BB4-BF144D208619@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0911110625230.73921@in1.dns-oarc.net>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:34:52 +0000
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0911110625230.73921@in1.dns-oarc.net> (Duane Wessels's message of "Wed\, 11 Nov 2009 06\:29\:19 +0000 \(UTC\)")
Message-ID: <82639htner.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Re: Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:34:29 -0000

* Duane Wessels:

> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Nicholas Weaver wrote:
>
>> Also, has someone done a study what the major recursive resolvers do
>> on response failures from a root?  Do they go to another first or do
>> they try a smaller EDNS MTU?
>
> I gave a presentation on this at the DNS-OARC meeting last week:
>
> https://www.dns-oarc.net/files/workshop-200911/Duane_Wessels.pdf

Have you installed any trust anchors in the resolver?  (I don't think
so, the packet numbers are a bit on the lower side for that.)

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99