Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator

Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour@cira.ca> Thu, 21 March 2019 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Jacques.Latour@cira.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9084C131235; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8wIC0n0ZIAe; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.cira.ca (mx2.cira.ca [192.228.22.117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97412131215; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at cira.ca
Received: from CRP-EX16-02.CORP.CIRA.CA (10.2.36.121) by CRP-EX16-01.CORP.CIRA.CA (10.2.36.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1531.3; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:02:42 -0400
Received: from CRP-EX16-02.CORP.CIRA.CA ([fe80::15c6:1482:4083:e9f7]) by CRP-EX16-02.CORP.CIRA.CA ([fe80::15c6:1482:4083:e9f7%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1531.010; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:02:42 -0400
From: Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour@cira.ca>
To: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator
Thread-Index: AQHU2/tchOAebL7fmUqbjaqsfD9WBqYWqMgQ
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:02:42 +0000
Message-ID: <428d5ff2b5704cdf956a5919e330e4dc@cira.ca>
References: <155218771419.28706.1428072426137578566.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1914607.BasjITR8KA@linux-9daj> <CA+9kkMAYR19CCCLN00A5Oy_=9Z97FQogCz-vdC=M7Ffn47fTgQ@mail.gmail.com> <1900056.F7IrilhNgi@linux-9daj> <CA+9kkMCgmzjbPM+DTUYuS3OsT+wOCmsyaGPg6fPu=w-ibL=NrA@mail.gmail.com> <5F768C24-4ECF-4369-9D51-B90C4426409B@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <5F768C24-4ECF-4369-9D51-B90C4426409B@fl1ger.de>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.16.4.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/cqYwj1IWJu9akQAkhkOmYMILiKg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:02:46 -0000

Plus! 
Is anyone looking at adding DoH and DoT servers as part of DHCP/SLAAC?  So the local resolver and apps and browsers can go the _appropriate_ name resolution resource(s) using the protocol of choice. That would be much simpler for default configuration in enterprise and ISP.

>From: DNSOP <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Ralf Weber

>You can not get on a network with at least trusting some of its infrastructure, be
>it SLAAC or DHCP (which BTW both carry information for DNS resolving). The
>question is where you draw the line and IMHO DNS or name resolution is a basic
>network function and not an application setting.
>