IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] we already have a new version of this problem

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 09 November 2015 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095581B7B7D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:49:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.811
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.811 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ib1Y9IHEkidJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:49:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10EF1B7B7B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:49:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:35026) by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1Zvj5C-0006CX-Z9 (Exim 4.86_36-e07b163) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:49:50 +0000
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1Zvj5C-0007d0-R9 (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:49:50 +0000
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:49:50 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: "Wessels, Duane" <dwessels@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <855E6C9C-79F5-4DE5-B1F8-574A697E9EF0@verisign.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1511090949140.25050@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CAKr6gn0oiK9WKfN95b=muuxG0+0oKv8KDaq=xpabRf-zgCO+gQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1511051112440.959@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <855E6C9C-79F5-4DE5-B1F8-574A697E9EF0@verisign.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/cuq4JYq39qvOZI-2efsMDbQNh6I>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] we already have a new version of this problem
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:49:55 -0000

Wessels, Duane <dwessels@verisign.com> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2015, at 3:26 AM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone done a survey of where the leaked .home queries come from?
>
> In the spirit of Measurement-Driven Protocol Engineering here are some
> recent data points from root servers:

Wow, cool, and totally not what I guessed. Thanks!

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Trafalgar: Easterly 5 to 7 in southeast, otherwise variable 3 or 4. Moderate,
occasionally rough in southeast. Fair. Moderate or good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email