IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 12 March 2019 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251AC1200B3; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xkFRvLGjfO9K; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A672126F72; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E58E28038C; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:39:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (pa-th3.interco.nic.fr [192.134.4.74]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9532F28033B; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:39:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91318663E720; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:39:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8CD5440235; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:39:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:39:20 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, doh@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>, dns-privacy@ietf.org, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Ackermann, Michael" <mackermann@bcbsm.com>
Message-ID: <20190312153920.4w4gmlrsglrvjt4p@nic.fr>
References: <1700920918.12557.1552229700654@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <7667c4d7-2e78-0a27-84af-cf1c00fd4897@cs.tcd.ie> <1991054337.12802.1552259263075@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <eea64b30-aad0-a030-5360-1b1484f1d0e3@huitema.net> <CAPsNn2WhjHSEHJUEL8GB6X0d24fkajgPnY4YgkOQbXjyxb5q8Q@mail.gmail.com> <e62efaf3-4a35-4a52-5ed4-dee2e7fafe72@huitema.net> <69f989ba-0939-b917-b586-9e3af3fb8b74@redbarn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <69f989ba-0939-b917-b586-9e3af3fb8b74@redbarn.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.8
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/d1aqco7VMQLtxJvocTykxPoCbd8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:39:24 -0000

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:24:56PM -0700,
 Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote 
 a message of 82 lines which said:

> set up a war between end users and network operators,

Well, the tussle already exists. It does not depend on whether you
like it or not, on whether the IETF approves it or not. When people
have different interests, there is a tussle. What we can hope is to
discuss it in civilized ways. But we cannot make it disappear.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email