IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] another draft (was Re: Clarifying referrals (#35) )

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 14 November 2017 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3840F1294FA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=M+SGdoad; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=bUc1q1Il
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qa1HefKP0Y9V for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17ABF1201F2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863A4BF56B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:49:09 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1510624149; bh=/NkMGRxJi7vsE9DO82g1D1nKb+K8p2gJXOgwyCcO0Sg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M+SGdoadey6RvqjnrMyjGw5Ibk0YY7spFXLUwi6sXycI/FhYK6nyIcsoLQmUzTcdf wfFg38pWE1uo2V+TAypxQZr4uVM/6BA9Yt/IZCre2wqIDn66XEvvGWjKycczNWdrZc Ksd/Nkydsjvwhm0YYt2/UQfq0YJP4gFt7psMxfYo=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pp21RhQ6lp-B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:49:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:49:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1510624148; bh=/NkMGRxJi7vsE9DO82g1D1nKb+K8p2gJXOgwyCcO0Sg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bUc1q1IlXRpzArHfoyUw3uPXeIgxcYHI9NpEIuQcpTwcN2TqZ62O+0QbosnZo5hDZ rll9wMHs7WASBQpsMw6oysgEDarIYLd76FyInR9IJaVL9JJe83xF6FVgysNXejMsPg MKItRZ/s7Mle2xKFmxDRuOXUjiyX8aJtPsp1UFGU=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20171114014905.kvxzagf7gduupzm4@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <20171112075445.tf2ut5dxzhhnqe7l@mx4.yitter.info> <20171112131831.GA32208@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <20171113014445.ncldrwnuuvluecx7@mx4.yitter.info> <5A08FD96.8030907@redbarn.org> <20171113020736.ga7rzgst2hurb56h@mx4.yitter.info> <5A09068A.3030206@redbarn.org> <c66000fbd9174916a1142650298c7632@XCASPRD01-DFT.dpu.depaul.edu> <20171113085235.2fddd72a@p50.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171113085235.2fddd72a@p50.localdomain>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/d2pa9BzA9iXWEIWjYp-LIECh39A>
Subject: [DNSOP] another draft (was Re: Clarifying referrals (#35) )
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:49:11 -0000

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 08:52:35AM -0600, John Kristoff wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:26:41 +0000
> Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is quite a helpful response, thanks.  I wonder whether more of it
> > ought to go in discussion (or a new draft),
> 
> I'd suggest a new draft be produced with which discussion could ensue.

Given the discussion that ensued only here, it's pretty clear that
some new text is needed.  If nobody else writes one before I get the
round tuit, I will, and will update the text about referrals also.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email