Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-arnt-yao-dnsop-root-data-caching-00.txt

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Thu, 14 February 2019 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCFA1310B4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:29:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b9GhnyVOlalN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD7B61311B5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECEDC05E3; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:31:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1550165479; bh=u+gbVr5JvjgYAcZ28YMQrLVlRWyK+1vSPlE/fhjSoF4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=H45B7ivY3qK5N8xiMJddLHy7qeUqdTIS4H8j0nl7WBfcPmchbCBTyCovs2j0H0Hjz IkcGJm2o26dd9z6K5q7sCGOWI6qW0Df+E7uFFSW3Lsz+BEKV0/m8t7BSQ/Qd0nshMu RxqjURGbuf7/f+3Z+XOmVCn/QlfWVHOz2VZ41w1s=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1550165478-26265-2661/9/20; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:31:18 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>, dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:29:31 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <587d85ee-73bc-40f4-aae8-550d877ca6d1@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902141349060.18720@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <4d51e683.32d.168ea651be8.Coremail.yaojk@cnnic.cn> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902141349060.18720@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Trojita/0.7; Qt/5.7.1; xcb; Linux; Devuan GNU/Linux 2.0 (ascii)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/d3QEUEvSbdyi_3TyTmmUEInIUaU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-arnt-yao-dnsop-root-data-caching-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:29:41 -0000

On Thursday 14 February 2019 14:58:58 CET, Tony Finch wrote:
> How does this relate to:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-hammer
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis

It originates in various ideas Jiankang and I have chatted about.

I didn't like 7706, because I feel that the servers that have long ping 
times to the nearest root are more likely to have admins who make mistakes. 
Jiankang and I discussed alternatives when we met a while ago, and a few 
times since. Once we hit upon this possibility, we didn't discuss 
draft-wkumari-dnsop-hammer, perhaps because it's expired and we'd 
forgotten. Mental entropy.

Compared to the hammer draft, I should say that this is dead simple, has 
one fewer acronyms, and that both of those are intentional features.

I see your name is in the text. Why did you let it expire?

> It looks like this new draft is actually a revision of:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yao-dnsop-root-cache

Probably correct. IIt was I who did the typing, and I prefer to start by 
editing something that already has the right XML stuff and at least some 
references etc.

Arnt