IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 24 July 2018 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDB6130E22 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xsVQ8CKiCEtZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B2C130EDE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q20-v6so5058323ith.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sdMi4BcjpmMKBymlhCZBNwNRb38a/RwNxzPObQitGco=; b=jOwgIzeZWD9AI5dNtuzNzvubPs+nEvHa1X4Z7aCjodWBf6Ia59M70C2K563WfviGOn LRAhLKq02Kze8CVVWFzsFRTt6IqO5fq6MpEOn35j7UFBnBTDQsZ+44Am4f450DBrhfUg MKs7atiJXnkL1BMMETUewhne6LGpXvAhE64w9B4yOmQLDF0CgGWXIDRi1iPFcGMFNXvs OxX0DECLfaox8VW0Q20QkK1qVxW0+KlSgf158z21jXzRJ+9+E6PkpP3sPWKPgRr3fgTr xZKYq5M+fHWe0hz3kbFjFLqG4xUbnIoer7meWXs8p2XaXbhfZFRRC/+B5Rhi0HfaEf9l uPrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sdMi4BcjpmMKBymlhCZBNwNRb38a/RwNxzPObQitGco=; b=tpnMfI0leJ2DI+mkSa4zUM9zcV9iV+K6F0ykSFru2X5rDuHJv8c4uCz2DHT++cjT+g QAA5Gw5i4eUvZMIkRmVcKw3gN2e1Dn+doCp2lB7I7s8Qde++8W10l0a1fCHUFTahEBtC hOfQKZWRAaOF0C6ODVUVj5i1QvqZNznJUcLlsjjXPYKv5ThfLnFwy9Mf5sBZPtUl+LL6 icvskYRhKJxWPlbCnKsb6OWSIRwTu6Z2awd0wxIYAxUdTN/1/zBOmiCv4bPo27N6NvN/ 4QabeiVNJOXVtP1zMqcTnVADFUoNLtoBKrzH90LFuLI16vaMMrGyaCAVE1xz3xGDPk/V KurQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlE9Sg0vPhrPvxs/odZry2qTnrbyluD/WvDtMvqO1Ise4O2jYpKx nieDsIP/UmI38jGbIWwhytevYVWfbCk12c3RZ3uXiA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcjJM0mb8jLPW+4q0l2+B/2WK+P3pS05MKeNWqfCVgc+FucxvbTQUJD/sMrFHcXX0PLeOJPNd4Y75vDC1qv0so=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:d485:: with SMTP id x127-v6mr3785332itg.82.1532456287089; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:b442:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807241332220.19044@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+H_xqXyOPOaiAgu=PW8UwT-zX=0zRm3A20V9jbnHocDXw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807241332220.19044@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:17:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nV9tfbBKYGvz+vrDbCAyipqguR3mBAdr2ihUS_0jbk=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a03ad40571c2c815"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dBPk7ky0k6cJSA5fHvFsDWLt1U4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:18:13 -0000

Can you unpack that a bit, Paul?   What's the scenario where this is a
problem?   Not disagreeing, just not seeing it.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> We discussed this and there appears to be support to adopt this, with
>> the caveat of fleshing out some of the discussions which came up.
>>
>>
>> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis
>>
>> The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/d
>> oc/draft-kh-dnsop-7706bis/
>>
>
> While I agree with the goal of the draft, to keep root server queries on
> the local host, I don't like how it is suggesting to run a DNS server on
> localhost:53, because that is going to cause problems with running
> validating resolvers on the stub. There is already enough racy
> conditions on systems with virtual machines and running dhcp/dns servers
> for those that are racing to own 127.0.0.1:53
>
> But again, having a well integrated method for slaving the root zone on
> a local validating stub resolver is something that everyone should do
> (along with query minimalization)
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email