IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Mon, 05 January 2015 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7216F1A6F3A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:06:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=1.049, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l9Cc2w591gjz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F311A0371 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.6.134] (unknown [8.28.216.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D105E13B5F; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 18:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <54A9BB75.30301@redbarn.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:15:17 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Windows/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
References: <CAH1iCirCRpJxHWu62nCSTCmSumXfTNHi=-jt5eWXzRgspJjm9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCip7iGgM=eiaVcy3fHx+KdOJgd5Rh8zLsnDPMgoEnE-HvA@mail.gmail.com> <0BB798D6-60F4-492D-819A-EF4E0F5848B5@virtualized.org> <20150104193602.GA23109@sources.org> <2C89D784-79BF-4906-9ABB-1B0EACA1D408@nic.br>
In-Reply-To: <2C89D784-79BF-4906-9ABB-1B0EACA1D408@nic.br>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050906010208010600050803"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dPCP28WQxhUKjfDI3oJRscgLH14
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:06:23 -0000


> Rubens Kuhl <mailto:rubensk@nic.br>
> Sunday, January 04, 2015 2:11 PM
>
>
> ...
>
> My guess is this would even accommodate cases such as dotless domains
> (like dk) and in-addr.arpa.

i prefer the more aggressive approach, because caching.

also noting, dotless domains exist. dotless hostnames (for mail, web,
etc) by def'n do not.

-- 
Paul Vixie

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status