Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 04 July 2017 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C767131441 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qJXU3AuLqCYg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B1312762F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r30so165141717qtc.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ou7b3m34UhCdE18S0bqD1OlTy4/NP2PQg/oUQVl3xxk=; b=1TohnQB2C+AACdtEua6w4WE97ExxTZdUAKIvqEm6MpIcPfnAw7ERd/Afg0N6YfKKpE fHCIh4962spgUYvh7xzHEjrzYm7gm/V1/1nW3n++JG/5Jg2T+N+N8DfPtzZMJxk18vMh jyy9NebhvLnt2LS09Vm+DoSpRsLnps/hiuA2btAfLUJhModduqF2F5JyA6DkWbBRQUpj qUsAcpltQlyCSx0B3sH7vTOcfMuGX1I5Km7OubqtzYsz2RH/VeMm0VsLkKsOqLtNDt25 rLczHgZ93GmaWSVjnOZJoCuZHgQNdpRyIUkMK/E0Bc1mePdvXQ0++A00g7eWGiahCekv BaKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ou7b3m34UhCdE18S0bqD1OlTy4/NP2PQg/oUQVl3xxk=; b=gHpXJpSWnfiy3gaAU7rgvI280Ipp+v2rguTeKX9amNo0MzazFP+64UIDFAXlNGff09 8FV1KyYENEBdCjIu/ksAgVneeVGgHvZmI/WZ7BV8dmxPOKViMBZ/uHQHrZre1Z9MHb4B RNbLaPszKyUgnwll99VC8A4iAVBLM0l98ESw6qZGKzG5n5l+GCZZjGL0b76EBVC34Xv+ 4gKzBJIPYwe6JHapASjzAquwe9M1AbbarEXu+cN4XH6Rd2g+SsdJ24BlsfaPFN53BhBZ iz37YCzrfjWjZ88GooLGC6HB3v0xR0ff3CARkKoJ/X7RjLIzSSDOB8px0qqO4NjVUcwB H65A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxMPZKfiHR2Hj129NaWlz4xvNtL1WLWnAnKp3Vb3HBuK7SpXB2c o7acy7/Oqy/KdmliP5IkCA==
X-Received: by 10.237.34.196 with SMTP id q4mr40864807qtc.39.1499174618803; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.114] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f29sm15771305qtc.13.2017.07.04.06.23.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15A5304i)
In-Reply-To: <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:23:37 -0400
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, dnsop@ietf.org, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F98FEA1C-3F3F-4344-8B07-996AAD899CC2@fugue.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com> <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dShAfpTCx_TOBhVGFqEOH_z8IJk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:23:42 -0000

On Jul 4, 2017, at 3:39 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>; wrote:
> is there a companion document with the list of benefits/advantages?  or
> is thins just one of those ietf documents from on high meant to kill
> something?

This is a very good question. We weren’t asked to answer that question, so we didn’t.  It is assumed throughout the document that various proponents of special use domains have good reasons for wanting them, and further that it is already accepted in principle that if their reason for wanting them is valid, they can have them (modulo technical constraints like delegation). So we didn’t delve into that. But perhaps we should have.