Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)

SM <> Wed, 19 February 2014 04:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F2C1A030F for <>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:25:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iRQaM0WaqkC for <>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:25:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F301A0129 for <>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:25:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (IDENT:sm@localhost []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1J4OeGw006431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:24:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1392783891; bh=3oCdE7q9Km10nhsRCBWg2WUSKYevHTDI6GPEouGoi64=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=MXXa1RsJ0WsXqsHcuIncrNQOSmk6diY2OPICf3J+766KHVc7MiuC+1BGd2r2Arcek K+3vF5WUhc0CqCnvYz+IAeT0js6dPvxqR69N4yMy9tmc8xKD2v50xxoB4SNsOJsqvr E+GT2lwznWSpyp5mtwYhbT7a2g6wkHNDyprbpWpw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1392783891;; bh=3oCdE7q9Km10nhsRCBWg2WUSKYevHTDI6GPEouGoi64=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=g21AFKoFp1E3RyT87vLlsAAA4nYMwMg+rv2NnV1vtR0DavVfIraL1G0C7BH7gx8FV vC7j2/HF/mqYBUbeovbiCe1KBPPkhBDW91F1u8b0y7Z63kpBtlogBpeamar3hqzpQ/ k9ySxj4MJ9YOtzWO5L0OWAlhgonWiyTb9GXsDbd0=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:41:09 -0800
To: Joe Abley <>
From: SM <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: dnsop <>, Paul Wouters <>, David Conrad <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 04:25:05 -0000

Hi Joe,
At 10:58 18-02-2014, Joe Abley wrote:
>I had some experience with this recently with the document that 
>became RFC 7043.
>Code-point assignment was swift. Implementation in major nameservers 
>was swift (although one or two of them left the types commented out 
>in the source until the RFC was published). The RFC publication 
>process was not arduous, even given the privacy concerns with this 
>particular proposal.
>I appreciate that knowing the process made things easier (mainly; I 
>was wrong about some things and had to be educated). But I would not 
>describe the process as difficult, and certainly not insurmountable.

I was not thinking of the IETF process.  Mark Andrews covered what I 
was thinking of in a message at