IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Tue, 23 February 2010 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD2F3A7A68 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:06:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.13 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9bZtHOEZILt for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:06:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.schlyter.se (trinitario.schlyter.se [195.47.254.10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCF23A6B90 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:06:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [201.238.130.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roy) by mail.schlyter.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB7A72D4AD; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:08:07 +0100 (MET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <20100223190311.GD55822@isc.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:08:05 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <9C65A5B3-CF53-4EF2-BC2D-897F40A09FBA@dnss.ec>
References: <200904282021.n3SKL3sg051528@givry.fdupont.fr> <59A58419-FDBD-4810-B2FA-0D293FFA00A5@NLnetLabs.nl> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1001211245180.12114@newtla.xelerance.com> <1AEAE091-2EB3-41DC-A51B-8DD49C10FAD5@NLnetLabs.nl> <24C8A8E2A81760E31D4CDE4A@Ximines.local> <8E6C64ED-A336-4E8B-996F-9FB471EB07C6@NLnetLabs.nl> <823a0s4dvz.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1002231021210.9909@newtla.xelerance.com> <20100223190311.GD55822@isc.org>
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:06:10 -0000

On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:

>>> hashes.  However, NSEC records are sometimes returned in response to
>>> DO=0 queries,
>> 
>> Wouldn't that be an implementation bug?
> 
> Not if it was an ANY query.  Otherwise, yes.

Or an NSEC query.

Roy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email