IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] my dnse vision

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 11 March 2014 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91381A074C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id niEGYCHn7yAv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558AB1A075D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1887AC9494; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=dkim2012; t=1394551116; bh=unIIrZUG37MbB7mJKnyPS3KP2lYxRF+m7DAp0jjG6hI=; h=To:Cc:From:References:Subject:In-reply-to:Date; b=uxmrf1+gHzc4YDj2Z7BPL3f4emEONPS7iaQZFIDf9PecodJV0z4wJGar8JZ2wlJ0C BIy/GuUHbFAgkd2DanYyqoElkrJrpOIJoaofhSHasngbUSMIHy0+0YtJCnXYmPUr4f lH1klk6IlWck5/6Ol5VXvkThYN7mBzevJOBfB0dE=
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395E716005D; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:19:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-183-50.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.183.50]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08A7F160055; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:19:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70CE10EA391; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 02:18:32 +1100 (EST)
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <201403051107.s25B7ext069332@givry.fdupont.fr> <02410136-DFE2-42C8-A91E-AA84641AFFCF@ogud.com> <20140305144213.GA19170@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1403051637160.18502@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20140306145020.GA5976@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1403101654150.18502@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAMm+LwjSdvpKKm-nWbx0AUavcGyANkT+mw-FLQQp_R1nEtf==Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1403101737520.13302@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAMm+LwhnDGJftdSZMyOHi3kjocP6Pw=NOtCNQr5Kr+pOmaL1zg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:28:56 -0400." <CAMm+LwhnDGJftdSZMyOHi3kjocP6Pw=NOtCNQr5Kr+pOmaL1zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 02:18:32 +1100
Message-Id: <20140311151832.C70CE10EA391@rock.dv.isc.org>
X-DCC--Metrics: post.isc.org; whitelist
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dmh6Xww7GNWjo-AXILBso77bVDM
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] my dnse vision
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:18:43 -0000

In message <CAMm+LwhnDGJftdSZMyOHi3kjocP6Pw=NOtCNQr5Kr+pOmaL1zg@mail.gmail.com>
, Phillip Hallam-Baker writes:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> 
> > Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > First off it means that if the recursive is being used in discovery-only
> > > mode it can simply pass data from the authoritative to the stub without
> > > checking the DNSSEC chain.
> >
> > If the recursive server is cacheing it needs to do DNSSEC validation to
> > protect its cache from poisonous authorities.
> 
> 
> But that would be an offline activity rather than within the response loop
> to service the request from the stub.
 
Actually it needs to be within the response loop so it can discard
bad data and move onto a different server.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email