Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Tue, 20 December 2016 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DAA129B4B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:35:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p3Ejhf7RRf6q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:35:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21191129B5F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:35:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [46.227.151.81] (port=51085 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1cJNO5-0001j1-76 (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:35:37 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <8f78a52b-01ae-f529-a1ec-d7eb90fe94be@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:35:48 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/do0nr21DVnp_SoTZlb5HJ0gGnr8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:35:50 -0000


On 20/12/2016 16:33, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Counter-question: of what value is documenting this current practice?
> Anyone who is already using it can find the documentation for it from
> their software vendor. There is nothing here that really affects the
> rest of the DNS other than "there will be lies".

The document primarily covers BIND's behaviour.

It would be good if other implementations were completely compatible
with that, and this also forms the baseline for potential future
enhancements which could be under IETF change control.

Ray