IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> Tue, 06 January 2015 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40871A1AE1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:14:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnzlEp9XpSTO for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:14:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E194C1A0406 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r2so5164463igi.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:14:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nOuBKSbWPeeNX4zXbwNys7ymgdM2510/v7D9KLBk1XU=; b=LYuo06WA3DWeMcCnmha6P4roW6GIi63iDregHrijVGZ5Srvso88CuHbgLV/YKp22M+ I0WudjOXmGNj6emT/MH14A4tDQSzWvhBV/+/Ce20qDPCLPse0Ult/aC+r52yiCIt0HqF zlj36qwsY7tJL6vajERv8R7phkVjESbymfpw47PP2N6ryh3aZHjwKhHn9Ha5xAWVSPug qIaD7HvRcONCM74FTF0WNGZU62vMt2d8ZPZO+XX8FTPd8CriwwLI+v5MSGiOzsbXzhN9 kbMbI6RTfeFDk5CrUlSN9CZxR75vu1bnwN/hHIdxO4TgX9/JY26Tc7jYfB1zkpORhSE3 M7pQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.29.6 with SMTP id p6mr72326004icc.85.1420568071070; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.225.196 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:14:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLZgF115KOXFH=envzcrJEu_DogbeDgq2SPvgMXdn74eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH1iCirCRpJxHWu62nCSTCmSumXfTNHi=-jt5eWXzRgspJjm9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCip7iGgM=eiaVcy3fHx+KdOJgd5Rh8zLsnDPMgoEnE-HvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLZgF115KOXFH=envzcrJEu_DogbeDgq2SPvgMXdn74eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 13:14:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdUa8a0C4C_zNsHwic57Fo1aZb4JvStLbPXW=nUEAn4DGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf301d426641675e050bffc7d4"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dvbX-vUhZasYW5jCnm_thOiEG-s
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shuque@gmail.com
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 18:14:34 -0000

from draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation:

2.  Qname minimisation
>
>    The idea is to minimise the amount of data sent from the DNS
>    resolver.  When a resolver receives the query "What is the AAAA
>    record for www.example.com?", it sends to the root (assuming a cold
>    resolver, whose cache is empty) the very same question.  Sending
>    "What are the NS records for .com?"  would be sufficient (since it
>    will be the answer from the root anyway).  To do so would be
>    compatible with the current DNS system and therefore could be easily
>    deployable, since it is an unilateral change to the resolvers.
>
>    If "minimisation" is too long, you can write it "m12n".
>

I generally dislike these kinds of contractions, but I assume you meant
"m10n". There are 10 letters between m and n. (contrast i18n and l10n).

Shumon Huque

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status