Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sun, 05 July 2015 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADD71A1EEC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 04:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mZ57QgiyElJ7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 04:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D051A1BE7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 04:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 2051D3BAC4; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:53:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18ED6190828; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:51:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 13:51:08 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>
Message-ID: <20150705115107.GA27268@sources.org>
References: <20150704063120.2380.qmail@ary.lan> <017CF015-8A06-40D5-9ECF-B7B7E208C7AF@frobbit.se> <6F830DF3-9FD6-43A1-8E9A-5854958BA848@shinkuro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6F830DF3-9FD6-43A1-8E9A-5854958BA848@shinkuro.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.1
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dyCQ3pjAIi663EZ-lnk7jufXQbE>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 11:53:38 -0000

On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 09:16:17AM -0700,
 Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> wrote 
 a message of 21 lines which said:

> except for the additional load it places on the root servers,

RFC 7535 could be a solution.

> I propose augmenting the DNS to include entries in the root that
> serve the purpose of giving slow NXDOMAIN responses instead of quick
> responses for those strings that the IETF has identified as not
> TLDs.

If it is a serious proposal, I object. Delaying answers require
keeping state in the authoritative name server and opens a nice DoS
boulevard.