IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-06.txt

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 10 July 2017 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E4313193D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qb0JVJaC7Mp4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCED1276AF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.189.188] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v6ANF8oN092819 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:15:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [169.254.189.188]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:15:52 -0700
Message-ID: <FD56CE11-F6D4-4608-8FBF-4F7AAE97E053@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D02BDF5-FE9B-4E77-A561-5E0988AEBCF9@powerdns.com>
References: <149894524329.526.18431408698564464455@ietfa.amsl.com> <2D02BDF5-FE9B-4E77-A561-5E0988AEBCF9@powerdns.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eBDDDgSvC1sKNedzZpRhPvLNOR0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:15:57 -0000

On 3 Jul 2017, at 1:48, Peter van Dijk wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 1 Jul 2017, at 23:40, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>
>> Abstract:
>>    The DNS is defined in literally dozens of different RFCs.  The
>>    terminology used by implementers and developers of DNS protocols, and
>>    by operators of DNS systems, has sometimes changed in the decades
>>    since the DNS was first defined.  This document gives current
>>    definitions for many of the terms used in the DNS in a single
>>    document.
>>
>>    This document will be the successor to RFC 7719, and thus will
>>    obsolete RFC 7719.  It will also update RFC 2308 and RFC 3758.
>
> s/3758/3757/

Yeeps! Fixed in the source for the next update. Thanks!

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email