Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs.
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 21:53 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1E51A02B3; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:53:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyZO40F4CH-z; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D621F1A02D6; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:52:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u56so171741wes.37 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:52:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=K+87+MEOW5na1EfMNwEBc7wV3wiUubu9Qjb42X3opfU=; b=BxjGYALObpgzV8/iwu74aOrQfatLzE0hgx+SivmQfI3AfVjl0U63d17gEsORa234GH RAxY9REZ505ivYZB6WxF3UV69N4A8ffWPcol4qRuajinGDgCpUQ+1YdO74APwKOUlV2q vpIJ3p/aEEmYwZ8bNbXJwQlZuZ+D1h/m8dKB8taJXZNKSiofF3S5OUkFqkCJfIAyJQnd RhauhEJqwhmU2KD7T6m7+bE2AJqttELkwg9QZJW38AQSZIAAZ5ykCtuuLyIkBv3fYhAU w5u892uz21PWYayCuhlfagfNSsCadEFPwfWdOu1ZbR9x1QoAYgi7kg/eyKQ9M7FzZR1E tZCw==
X-Received: by 10.194.82.35 with SMTP id f3mr3036867wjy.36.1393969974935; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-a761.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-a761.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.167.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id de3sm1175493wjb.8.2014.03.04.13.52.53 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <53164B35.4080501@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:52:53 +0000
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/29.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
References: <743CBE81-8973-46A4-83F4-3B7978AC031F@bogus.com> <CAHw9_iKVnrSyRqmfxs9dTuE9YSJaoXJyxfGWeX2aV3yR0gxMJA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKVnrSyRqmfxs9dTuE9YSJaoXJyxfGWeX2aV3yR0gxMJA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040506080105020803000407"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eEwJLmrrZNhUSBwc437WiwJ1eOs
Cc: "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:53:04 -0000
On 3/4/14, 8:13 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 4, 2014, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com > <mailto:joelja@bogus.com>> wrote: > > DNSop folks, > > If we created a new session in the thursday evening 18:40-20:40 > slot to accommodate expanded discussion of the Drafts discussed > during DNSE and deconflicted that discussion with UTA on friday > morning would that be a significant imposition? it seems unlikely > that more than a 1/3 of the slot would be required. > > > That sounds useful to me -- unfortunaly I have a conflict, but if I > didn't I'd be there with bells on. We should hear from the DNSOP presenters to see if they have conflicts, plus a consensus of folks. The other option is to move the discussion into the beginning or end of the DNSOP discussion, so those who can attend UTA slide back over. tim
- [DNSOP] dnse related docs. Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. Allison Mankin
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. Carsten Strotmann
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] [Uta] dnse related docs. Dan York
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. Francis Dupont
- Re: [DNSOP] dnse related docs. Francis Dupont