Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <> Wed, 05 July 2017 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E5513154F; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.096
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kml23rXVOfnT; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6012C1319F9; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=51106; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1499283145; x=1500492745; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hIRIZ4fu0tQDMWBDYAPSEL3i8n7y4BESbsa4lBcxjEE=; b=M11alrRQrLnosdr4f28Eo3K5yQkSM5TEZLgY6PrJMhCZpz3W4+qRAux2 BK+P86m2zOpJrk47JzTypf/Zch+XiyXeZ5KxeQ6mw1m+YlqdXI2QhX9DD UgYyAyJPxDe11rhKjeZ8dF13jecD3w0wUMwep71bT+gKzFrhbhmAv6Dsc A=;
X-Files: bmhgnffkkhhgliop.png : 33772
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,313,1496102400"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="695617729"
Received: from (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jul 2017 19:32:21 +0000
Received: from [] ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v65JWKEr010245; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:32:20 GMT
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <>, Ted Lemon <>
Cc: " WG" <>,, Suzanne Woolf <>, dnsop-chairs <>, The IESG <>
References: <> <> <>
From: Benoit Claise <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 21:32:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1177770B537A810C91E269A0"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 19:32:32 -0000

> Hi, Ted,
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon < 
> <>> wrote:
>     Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just
>     to point this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be
>     correct.   It is claimed to be the list of problems that people
>     have asserted exist.   I do not agree that all the problems listed
>     are problems, nor I think does anyone else.   If that's not clear
>     in the document, that's probably worth correcting.
> I think my comments are more likely to be unclear than the way the 
> document describes the problem set. What you said, is what I think the 
> document says.
> I'm mostly sending comments about specific points that the document 
> makes, that I think I understand at a surface level, but I don't think 
> I understand the implications in a few cases, so, that's what I 
> included in my ballot.
> I think the document is clear enough on "claimed to be the list of 
> problems that people have asserted exist", and even if I didn't think 
> that was a fine basis for this document, I wouldn't dream of 
> suggesting that the authors change the criteria for what's included.
Part of my AD review, I asked the text to clarified. Hopefully, it's 
 From the 04 to 05 diff:

Regards, B.