IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05: (with DISCUSS)

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 07 January 2016 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD051AC3C7; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:30:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sRXwZhIR8rjX; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:30:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA221ABB1A; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:30:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59255880C7; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:30:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clemson.local (unknown [76.21.129.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E96A328081A; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:30:36 -0800 (PST)
To: "Mankin, Allison" <amankin@verisign.com>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
References: <20160106164323.11500.74482.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <05B859BA-73DE-48E9-A22A-3B99E404AF15@verisign.com> <D2B42421.FFE4C%aretana@cisco.com> <D2B424DC.602C6%amankin@verisign.com>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <568EBCD6.2010401@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:30:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D2B424DC.602C6%amankin@verisign.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gaUkrS7fdiEjesMXc47dlIWam0ntcaGSB"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eKD6K3T-DGpOBxn-b5owLgGwisI>
Cc: "tjw.ietf@gmail.com" <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis@ietf.org>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 19:30:39 -0000

Hi Allison,

On 1/7/16 2:26 PM, Mankin, Allison wrote:
> Alvaro,
> 
> Thanks for the update!  I did quickly learn my error on this.  It shows
> how we skim familiar things like Last Calls - I had expected it was PS and
> I didn¹t see the IS designation there at all.
> 
> I wasn¹t able to be on the Webex for the telechat today.
> 
> What happens now?   A two week PS Last Call?  (a question for JoelŠ)

As an AD (at least for the next 3 months), I don't think we need a new
LC. Rather, we can fix the meta data, announce the fix to the community,
and continue processing the document.

Brian

> 
> Onward and upward,
> 
> Allison
> 
> On 1/7/16, 2:19 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/6/16, 11:55 AM, "Mankin, Allison" <amankin@verisign.com> wrote:
>>
>> Allison:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>> I think you've found an XML editing bug on our part.
>>
>> No, actually the problem is not in the document, but in how the "Intended
>> RFC Status" was set on the datatracker page:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis/
>>
>> Alvaro.
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email