IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Mon, 03 March 2014 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4B61A0051 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:07:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YRdVaBYPaa-P for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BEC1A0011 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x48so3089352wes.21 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:07:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=JQR5it+tbr9sX6xgfIw30Uoqg9SXbYaPnhmJvFWYTUc=; b=DZGDv/fRlnCYiFP87NdoEbfvuWEtUcR2xHMDvcYgydBOHWeRvN1iYxzwosWMTarFW3 iRs6pfZcz70wMgkYkIMdF8ST2Y5WZFI5zS7oIg/dYH70SQMUH5WnrahQRFVn70lRZYVk fy+niBuosnHd3EyZ43ghUbKCwz16ObxcGEZ9Q=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=JQR5it+tbr9sX6xgfIw30Uoqg9SXbYaPnhmJvFWYTUc=; b=OnJoidymPix5hYKhBJLsuZW206pg5uY6HSMlgsnZTAbMCg/tCrRII8u0vvX7KljTW1 LMjcAyIaaOJvHde/Mp4C19A+yUzw73HgI6OGg3k6dDeDNY1wGa4WHXAwlACL7b7mv5Dq +RpKx8ht/0FtY6gKlqz2L4NbDgDBp3U9c7INO5yiozEGspNNlEN1N0fqxNfxHk8x61ZC goXCY+C1UrRGMpl4b83cCIC/BVAwkrAzFqMkYMH31EmPPygVUfZeBgIM/fx4HpF5TLmy uLh/eW4x985RcYA4B23Kw2RKBjluS1SWHIK+0DbiVrO/AzlPb/AP0BSgEKrtORJfWE8D n4/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnf+/MpjMgzcKK0z1/MEJuG5C1Nqc0WfG1dymU6nQ4kK6Zl5bWarLpE4eetvHwws+fbxJLa
X-Received: by 10.194.90.233 with SMTP id bz9mr6144850wjb.65.1393852033964; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:07:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wireless-v6.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:160:95f4:7ccd:b9ca:877c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dk9sm34995422wjb.4.2014.03.03.05.07.10 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:07:11 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A66C2787-E1FB-48F5-A9C5-A6FD7E43D9FB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <531450A1.8010507@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:07:09 +0000
Message-Id: <917146C3-BC38-4D10-AA14-C3B7A02B1193@hopcount.ca>
References: <20140129055438.2402.qmail@joyce.lan> <97E20887-2B9C-4EAD-826B-043306605F88@fl1ger.de> <54BE75D7-E70B-46AB-93C1-042E655BB5E7@apple.com> <D0AC0015-63C3-4C03-A8D0-888C435D2775@virtualized.org> <20140226100311.E73CA1069B39@rock.dv.isc.org> <8FEAF0FC-2AC3-4F39-9825-7068AAA6E40D@hopcount.ca> <CAHw9_iJa_OhzHVCQ4L0Aj+m=zAp6w=mJpAV-_ueh9iukhb3bnA@mail.gmail.com> <20140303102535.6f276963@quill> <531450A1.8010507@bogus.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eLf_sqdbI3PePEaLA3E-JGI6vxQ
Cc: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] additional special names Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:07:19 -0000

On 3 Mar 2014, at 9:51, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:

> On 3/3/14, 9:25 AM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
>> Warren makes a strong argument in favor of .alt I think.
> 
> yeah... anything that has the potential to result in additional leakage
> seems like a recipe for additional pain.

Well, except that the current proposal is to reserve (not delegate) ALT.

If we assume that leaks will happen, then they will hit the root servers and there's no opportunity to sink the queries anywhere else.

If we delegate ALT, then we have to decide where to. I can see this being contentious.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email