Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-02.txt
fujiwara@jprs.co.jp Tue, 15 September 2020 08:45 UTC
Return-Path: <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A0E3A0905 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7-aXaJadFcq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:218:3001:17::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1773A08E7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.8.161]) by off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08F8jnqK028019 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:45:49 +0900
Received: from off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss91 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C62A6026E21 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:45:49 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (off-cpu08.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.4.18]) by off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015D36026E1E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:45:49 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:45:48 +0900
Message-Id: <20200915.174548.504779386093886752.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: fujiwara@jprs.co.jp
In-Reply-To: <160015484354.1229.2551516510309513333@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <160015484354.1229.2551516510309513333@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 24.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-9.1.0.1231-8.6.0.1013-25666.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.177-5.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--21.177-5.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSS-9.1.0.1231-8.6.1013-25666.005
X-TMASE-Result: 10--21.176900-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 1OjsdqYNVapCXIGdsOwlUu5i6weAmSDKJqv0GX3SOh3tkF1BQZiRHVz+ OVMA6rt+S4upzJOGA0yXCq+47Rl9e80skHNPvvHmL1wE1KWC9ioXZUowilFqWznZfxjBVQRbhGN rRFaGihs9KA5aNAcAD7UjUBc2WEtNPMD2N6SZSV0aPMGCcVm9DviH64jt3FfEwgME763sEiKXnC uiDLP+AwP5UbjP5Jp9jte6DPwCr0xKpIM6MfwkGrllPmifeo7SZAGtCJE23Yi+d8e9SCCBEjYol zTpKNBbmq9/W8lNnrwkC5AZv2h0wEUToyE0kChlitvkWeP31kmteS443ymeUWDRM5o5qPEFq8Bv +OwMt8wDIQ8+xh6Q4SlbFY6cdxIsFNQhl0NE+g5HQFjzAbvJEKR07tNu9vNjWGzy6KaAc0Ib73T 67IXnSh0Z7hCD+QiF71IBItbJa78dqirDt7KDjMK1Ib9JAALxOhJ9m53n4aDsrUu5tR5UaCedFa zcPTOJotrlZRocfzKQKl4RwWngiuVHGbcDbAq6OX/V8P8ail3InWAWA4yE6Yu+qzzth2rmrV0Oi iNL0xhEcGY6dokS78RB0bsfrpPI6T/LTDsmJmg=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eNP0SlZdeRGpVBVZSJ6PbudOSUo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:45:55 -0000
Hello. We submitted draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-02. Authors simplified recommendations. Main recommendations are setting IP_DONTFRAG / IPV6_DONTFRAG options and compose DNS packets fit in path MTU. Then, DNS UDP responses are fragmentation free. If people want to use large packet size (with path MTU discovery), they need to calculate EDNS0 size from path MTU size. However, many people wants static recommendaton value for EDNS0 size. I'm wondering if it's better to write a recommended MTU value or a recommended EDNS0 size. -- Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. > > Title : Fragmentation Avoidance in DNS > Authors : Kazunori Fujiwara > Paul Vixie > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-02.txt > Pages : 10 > Date : 2020-09-15 > > Abstract: > EDNS0 enables a DNS server to send large responses using UDP and is > widely deployed. Path MTU discovery remains widely undeployed due to > security issues, and IP fragmentation has exposed weaknesses in > application protocols. Currently, DNS is known to be the largest > user of IP fragmentation. It is possible to avoid IP fragmentation > in DNS by limiting response size where possible, and signaling the > need to upgrade from UDP to TCP transport where necessary. This > document proposes to avoid IP fragmentation in DNS. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-02 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-02 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-02 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragme… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fr… fujiwara