Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List

Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> Mon, 09 June 2008 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9DC3A6A13; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5803A6784 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.723
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.723 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.424, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KnV0ya8DPFy2 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jet.mythic-beasts.com (jet.mythic-beasts.com [193.201.200.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B753A6C6D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 06:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grmarkham.plus.com ([80.229.30.161] helo=[192.168.1.6]) by jet.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (SSL 3.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1K5hcw-000813-36; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:41:38 +0100
Message-ID: <484D330B.2030604@mozilla.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:41:31 +0100
From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (X11/2008050714)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?UGF0cmlrIEbDpGx0c3Ryw7Zt?= <patrik@frobbit.se>
References: <484CFF47.1050106@mozilla.org> <0A0401AF-0DDF-491A-8118-4945DEE64DE7@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <0A0401AF-0DDF-491A-8118-4945DEE64DE7@frobbit.se>
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -18
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

Patrik Fältström wrote:
> The problem with any such mechanisms is that the barrier of entry for  
> new players (that does not match the currently used list -- including  
> non-upgraded software) is increased. More than what people think.

This isn't so. For TLDs not in the list, the usual rules (about e.g.
cookie setting) would be applied. In other words, the situation is no
different to what it is now. This information is additive.

Gerv
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop