IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] RFC 2845bis draft

"Peter J. Philipp" <pjp@centroid.eu> Wed, 27 February 2019 08:21 UTC

Return-Path: <pjp@centroid.eu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034A7130E8A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:21:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWYQ5U0Hl0Un for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omega.virgostar.net (omega.virgostar.net [108.61.211.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38BCE130E7C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.centroid.eu (p57B47964.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.180.121.100]) by mail.solarscale.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7a04c9d7 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:21:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from beta.centroid.eu (beta.internal.centroid.eu [192.168.177.2]) by mercury.centroid.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7e1806c9 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:21:46 +0100 (CET)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: "Peter J. Philipp" <pjp@centroid.eu>
Message-ID: <8c4249e4-8deb-c653-83d1-b97fd4d80786@centroid.eu>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:21:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eW6Q3SJWms15us1ANYUZ2AD_8to>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:52:21 -0800
Subject: [DNSOP] RFC 2845bis draft
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:24:32 -0000

Hi,

I'm in contact with the original RFC 2845 authors for clarifications on 
what is meant in section 4.4 for the meaning of "Prior MAC (running)".  
In the bis draft this is in section 6.4 and seems unchanged.  I'm having 
a hard time understanding this as an implementor, this is an area that 
needs clarification I believe.

Would you like to see any results that I glean from the authors so that 
this can be put on the bis draft?

Best Regards,

-peter

v2.20.0 | Report a Bug | By Email