Subject: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with COMMENT)
From: Mirja Kühlewind <[email-masked]>
To: "The IESG" <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], Benno Overeinder <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 04:26:26 -0700
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't quite understand why it was seen as beneficial by the group that this
doc has been split up, however, BCP does not seems adequate for this part of
the doc anymore (maybe PS instead as it updates some PS docs?).

Also, I think that the OLD/NEW style is not really necessary in most cases as
simply a sentence/reference to the registry is added.