Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 07 July 2018 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DF6130E6F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 02:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHdyXNQlo2pz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 02:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2191130E68 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 02:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id z6-v6so7069993wma.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 02:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6GPRNiXett0Wcv9U9vnFDD2oszkXKYtnxZZWBiutX7Y=; b=LN2x8EEynhXCNa6bXUARpfFnO4cW0lbllBnc9krra09kUzakKgagzrSmuij2hsXJSl pC7MMoHivMhqylf0zuSDJ9YWB8bhFQQwLcpU5jVhji+3rfqErRNTTf2qEcMXA1EQWVGh oAfnpGcuEGzKfD/PrPgoN7n3kJde034rmlB9TpBSzq1nJvZN5VefuKYRtn3OQtfbi8kX i9Qe4ITwnQGBa1C49Atp3CczGxLT2AAnC83y5EA0OdpJ1NasvW+1tBMa2HbMLj1fTs4u wv6nm5dIgp1KyERz8/lmF+mx51pOU6QT5xeBZp9hB5qqicsmE+FODnPzS5ahYvnJb6Tg jAkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6GPRNiXett0Wcv9U9vnFDD2oszkXKYtnxZZWBiutX7Y=; b=T/LsPmidd/1wgTxsQBectcMI25PtkmAoWozx5h7+nMjXF/TaIkWjTiVImq1YHDk0zQ zSn8OSWL/drSmE6L3UDI/Caj12ebw0X6iJr8NOxpwgQZRz9Eo87RKA6FNihhiPGOMqMY k+cwwr7UgRgKFoY2YE9ce0icDhUCGSyhmyrGd//CrBjATCdOIFAytfsV/6xj11JbnruH KYAMLtYR6kSH5UOJzNJKL92g8dwDWJwwNBz/y4B2DgVF6dAcjbcni6NMfJA8P08QzdN8 zuxGuc97wnv01L3/137YIroGcwtyq87X4IZAqlyPQSVY2/7l4pPyY6wHfuzM/wFh+/Kt sK9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3ekV/b0LqM70Z5obBtM50aVfbNPquPMBdknDEQCDccilFmYC6o XrMA5I930JUcAPIXB3Cz5BpW7wW01ozO/42BCjCqEg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpffCVtW6XEtGI9xSxc9gyDr8DjPhX2+PKbBPg0JYyXEXKNEh4J8gLInQ6L8+CUoUIUyASHr9wNgIoOIwp2YnFI=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6d9a:: with SMTP id b26-v6mr7686974wmi.74.1530955902481; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 02:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:adf:a414:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 02:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20180707001051.0d40cbb8@elandnews.com>
References: <b96bf132-ac52-e687-a8b4-19dcb9d35249@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20180707001051.0d40cbb8@elandnews.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 05:31:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+ELFcHvOuaKBAz2=oOs_ps2rEUS5qcjHBWe4vun4-3BTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bbfc280570657252"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ekFwjlvZ1LgoI2f0p0n9FYyCuJ4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 09:31:47 -0000

There were initial concerns that the IPR was unclear, and never fully
settled.
All the guidance I received was that the issue would be addressed

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2909/

Yes, it is old, but it was the only reference I could dig up.

Tim


On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 3:17 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> At 05:32 PM 06-07-2018, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>> One thing which arose early in the process was the issue of IPR and how
>> it would be resolved.  The simple answer is that it is resolved farther
>> up the process chain.   I spent time reading RFC 3979 on this topic:
>>
>
> That RFC is obsolete.  What is the IPR issue?
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>