Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 18 July 2018 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FED130E52 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 04:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Frdy7ED10SiT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 04:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB84130E15 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 04:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.47.60.89] (dhcp-9981.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.153.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w6IBUGqk095238 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 04:30:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host dhcp-9981.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.153.129] claimed to be [10.47.60.89]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 07:30:26 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.11.3r5509)
Message-ID: <B7DEB6B0-DD18-4690-B9FD-BDD1A620BF36@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAArYzr+g5a8txJYV5z7ora_Y54ys0fi3UOQBbgosxGUnYfdGcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180717121406.GA6681@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <0E1026DD-2304-43FE-BEED-B9CE2981D9E3@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807171724540.3719@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAArYzr+g5a8txJYV5z7ora_Y54ys0fi3UOQBbgosxGUnYfdGcA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/esne8vx7ON_-aof_PtSzxkpphRo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 11:30:39 -0000

On 18 Jul 2018, at 1:33, manu tman wrote:

> I'd like to see this standardized too.
>
> Side note: I would also be interested to get a return of experience 
> from
> people operating qname minimization at scale, the type of issues
> encountered, what are the ratios of such errors.... hint @marek :)

Just to be clear to the WG: Stéphane and I would love to be adding 
operational experience with minimization to the draft. That's the main 
reason we didn't just ask for the document to be moved from Experimental 
to Standards Track in-place.

--Paul Hoffman