Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01.txt

Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Mon, 25 January 2021 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A1A3A0C6F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:06:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hySGQQKOU6KR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E4D3A0C6A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [84.81.54.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 775E86A241; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:06:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from plato ([84.81.54.175]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id z8f9G/h7DmA1SwAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:06:16 +0100
Message-ID: <19695dd556103011364a0e0f8ca250c6cead2c70.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:06:15 +0100
In-Reply-To: <161156155643.2038.18221740878619339823@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <161156155643.2038.18221740878619339823@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: PowerDNS.COM B.V.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ez-rQ8S0TSwwY-rea0ESFVL0zMg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:06:21 -0000

Hello dnsop,

please find below revision -01 of this document.

Matt Nordhoff noticed that I upgraded the NSEC TTL requirements from
'SHOULD' to 'MUST' compared to the original texts, and pointed out that
incremental signers might have a hard time honouring that 'MUST'.

Matthijs Mekking (ISC/BIND) confirmed this theory. So, -01 drops the
requirement level back to SHOULD, just like the original texts.

I believe the document is ready for publication. Chairs, can we do a
WGLC?

On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 23:59 -0800, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : NSEC(3) TTLs and NSEC Aggressive Use
>         Author          : Peter van Dijk
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 8
> 	Date            : 2021-01-24
> 
> Abstract:
>    Due to a combination of unfortunate wording in earlier documents,
>    aggressive use of NSEC(3) records may deny names far beyond the
>    intended lifetime of a denial.  This document changes the definition
>    of the NSEC(3) TTL to correct that situation.  This document updates
>    RFC 4034, RFC 4035, and RFC 5155.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/