IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Wed, 21 October 2009 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B149C3A6955 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dzlVoJ0mUoY6 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [204.152.189.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE553A6934 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314B6898E14; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at virtualized.org
Received: from virtualized.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trantor.virtualized.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CsKCWtH9+6lG; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (c-24-130-210-17.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.210.17]) by virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E458898E09; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <82zl7luov4.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:39:54 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5866378D-2A58-4D5F-ABBE-86B69CAB147B@virtualized.org>
References: <OFA656600E.F5229B3D-ON80257650.005247BF-80257650.00527644@nominet.org.uk> <82skde36c9.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <DE23E9BF50E437E2D5CA65C8@Ximines.local> <82ljj61gle.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <200910202329.n9KNT56j048843@drugs.dv.isc.org> <1F61DD04-14A6-4349-8650-9CF27D27C3BC@hopcount.ca> <200910210145.n9L1j8of033780@drugs.dv.isc.org> <8263a9xnem.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <OFD7B965B7.53CC1C17-ON80257656.0028D85C-80257656.002974DF@nominet.org.uk> <82zl7luov4.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:39:51 -0000

Hi,

On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Indeed LOCAL.ARPA would need to be unsigned.
> Not really.  Why would it need to exist in the public tree at all?
> All we need is agreement from both ICANN and IETF that LOCAL.ARPA is
> reserved and not to be delegated in the official tree.

Entries in the ARPA tree are (now) only created by the IAB or a protocol action. ICANN merely implements what we're told. I'd suggest an IANA considerations section that simply said that "LOCAL.ARPA" is reserved and must not be delegated.

Regards,
-drc

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status