IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> Thu, 16 July 2009 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B763A6CFB for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.240, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AdUrptW5BU0c for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com (paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com [208.17.35.58]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28213A6D0C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.15.92]) by paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id KP-NTF18.75017292; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:08:16 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) by PACDCEXCSMTP03.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:08:18 -0400
Received: from 68.83.175.155 ([68.83.175.155]) by PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) via Exchange Front-End Server webmail.comcast.com ([24.40.8.153]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:07:52 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:07:50 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <C6849056.EF33%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
Thread-Index: AcoF5ibHH0W0KU9hSGSMwtfCkdKsmAAJ+Mz7
In-Reply-To: <20090716072256.GB5985@nic.fr>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3330576470_7490230"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jul 2009 12:08:18.0023 (UTC) FILETIME=[1AAB6770:01CA060E]
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:09:38 -0000



On 7/16/09 3:22 AM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
>> > I did not hear them so this sort of users is obviously not in the
>> > dnsop WG :-) More seriously, noone mentioned here any survey about
>> > this. So, we can just guess and speculate.
> 
> You can probably safely assume that any large ISP, as with any large company
> that is relatively deliberate in their service offerings, might choose to
> conduct usability studies, focus groups, and other user surveys prior to
> introducing such services...
> 
>> > If there is really a demand of some users, I have no problem with a
          > opt-in service, honestly explained to the users

         Actual consumer behavior doesn¹t really seem to work that way, but
I¹m not a behavioral psychologist.  ;-)  FWIW, I think most ISPs that
introduce such services see around a 0.1% opt-out rate.

Jason

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email