IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Document Adoption Poll (June 2022)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 27 June 2022 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05228C13CDB2; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 08:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLlXyNC76UaW; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 08:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC408C13CDAD; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 08:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LWsBp5nsjzKHc; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1656343874; bh=RLYpTUVYJw0WSY3641THVtHEUknIGS6rOGCyOVobG0c=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=sW2acvmBq9oa+LkHzY9NFVukvmpsrhbnIyamHJs+U25HY6q8hzOQOou5P0LkCJdnn h9vaxe8oo5iQdtzo4b6ZAg5oYZC8CM6r98XNeqrtP00bjuTKAa17lgTTjr7nP5n6/7 xRgp8aVv1nVb8DE4fo2Y9sj22SEIfDv4vyqP5rXQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0tRszTIpXxip; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:31:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:31:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94C2739A6D7; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:31:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934F339A6D6; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:31:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:31:12 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mbDuRAyiV0ggtnns+XoZHtDcVv=hMgGvYZd6UkMP0KwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <50e8d51c-e0a8-c31a-8ea6-268839577a94@nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+FGSdnW8NbBT72vGzNL9Bdr5DrM357K4X+iAkhS+aZs0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mbDuRAyiV0ggtnns+XoZHtDcVv=hMgGvYZd6UkMP0KwQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/f6SWT2ujRsxrSIILVoNVoJLaPng>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Document Adoption Poll (June 2022)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:31:23 -0000

On Mon, 27 Jun 2022, Ted Lemon wrote:

> I think your instinct is correct, Tim. It’s not an optimization to bypass discussion as part of a call for adoption. By asking us to
> consider six drafts at once, and discuss none of them, you create a strong likelihood of insufficient review. 

I also missed the option "I don't know yet", which at least I could
signal by not filling in the question for 4 of the 6 drafts.

Paul

> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 03:45 Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All
> 
> We have six documents that have requested adoption from the working group. My opinion is that we send out adoption calls for
> all of these and let the working group sort it out, but was told that is just crazy. Since Warren loves these poll things, we
> put another one together on all the documents in question.
> 
> 
> https://forms.gle/TVKeokYvnU55eq2x7
> 
> 
> We'll run this poll for two weeks and end on the 9th of July. However, we have a chai9rs call on the 5th of July and I'm
> confident we'll have an obvious clear set of documents to begin adoption calls on.
> 
> thanks
> tim
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email