IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http

Tomoyuki Sahara <tomosann@gmail.com> Fri, 22 July 2016 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tomosann@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E76F12DEE4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUPCEasa8gzg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3863112DEAB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id w127so141880773vkh.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=caVVSFSZ5Orduyq5AszudkedVt5Cj0XAtL2ZY65JGiM=; b=sAx3W0hLsoO0RM+DCDyccXU4FkIrJPXv4mVVbGdp8jQK7yTgYrxhDtTfh2zGJ7pxqS aqkQe1kQp+wfhHkQq5ZqnY2W+su2TMPFKrCyUCHBfNR+43taQM5xoOKowx3t+gbx3i5x 2PqzjZ8kQQQl12/YzGhk7O7dZ5wAds5Q9E5ADTiJXuENSht1cNqPF68rmzKFB13ANoc1 a9kaKQX34B5rb7tk0NITteiyG5TvwMsW7qCzegL+oEInudB6QoPTegE4bOrs9/Ulhu99 eRlt3ioP+pADCnTVY5dOuIT1mktpE8/vEFsyuReG4V4cuvS3CcqOJc+tnfbj4ThSrvQy ltxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=caVVSFSZ5Orduyq5AszudkedVt5Cj0XAtL2ZY65JGiM=; b=av3HVX9GaKleYSLu8H8ZtSOPuFEjASduxzz8WwjtQYZ6NiPeUcxYcXBiLGR4SHdldG TFWfgaX2XjBrIbM2yr/ENIjpfMM1oTiAq35oxGZ7tZJwKOTTAkP8+XP0aB1kM84Rw3LH Vl2D0PGF6Z3MbRhhCs9tGsJM1oqxzWSHk7CTp7+IMcuprEGY8LWl4WuSQYVv6vq+/Rwj 6siK7HZQN97R5XOktp2rq1bK/jXMkJCV1mQ8wwKGIFSRWje2WgguZlrTPQzcmzKn1tvF mbJnCfLL4jacUg7l9116tWM4xWMvz9pzkr1DsZqLORwSJWlUJfwHqtwaH3daS2sr3KiF W7cA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvKzYdltUtVrBjvocdaeqNCIylREbe+Hb5DxoR+sYiwe0JjDrYm8K28Nee+9LPfLXZRMqRvoIEUsLgPrg==
X-Received: by 10.159.35.112 with SMTP id 103mr888716uae.55.1469161487226; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.1.193 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6B692BCA-CC1E-4CAB-BF72-BF06BB2916AE@vpnc.org>
References: <em4745d403-8957-4994-9819-47cc8d9e1364@bodybag> <20160712030624.29734.qmail@ary.lan> <CAC=TB124b7G0w48LY4zP6TOqE+xZ3n1Fp4_KMaUTB_ZtCtrzCw@mail.gmail.com> <20160712205123.1b8c60de@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <6B692BCA-CC1E-4CAB-BF72-BF06BB2916AE@vpnc.org>
From: Tomoyuki Sahara <tomosann@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:24:46 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH=tA5ucp4eJbtHPN5j6fcXaQkgbV5whDMByE_VbCRbMej=8ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fHI4D5TGyOJx4pXkHaKlK6t4Xfk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 04:24:49 -0000

> If this WG adopts the document and then says "but we want to use an older version of the HTTP protocol", we should expect a fair amount of push-back during IETF Last Call.

RFC7540 clearly states:

  This specification is an alternative to, but does not obsolete, the
  HTTP/1.1 message syntax.


Thanks,
Tomoyuki

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status