Re: [DNSOP] avoiding fragmented DNS-over-UDP

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 22 March 2018 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FD212D7F8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 05:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZugdecfHNGpD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 05:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0AA124319 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 05:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:55489) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1eyzVd-000fIq-Jy (Exim 4.89_2) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:39:57 +0000
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:39:57 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803211607160.16357@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803221230280.2781@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803211607160.16357@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fRf3xqtih7VLY39ta39v9JyF02A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] avoiding fragmented DNS-over-UDP
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:40:01 -0000

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>; wrote:
>
> Here are some sketchy notes on what this might say...

Geoff Huston just told me I need to read Davey Song's very clever
"additional truncated response" and that he would roast my suggestions
if I didn't mention ATR :-)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-atr-large-resp
http://iepg.org/2018-03-18-ietf101/geoff.pdf

Geoff is very keen on ATR. I think we should work on ATR, and as well as
that it would still be a good idea to work on both client-side mitigations
(for servers that don't have mitigations) and on server-side response size
reduction to avoid unnecessary ATR / TCP.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>;  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Irish Sea: South or southwest 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 for a time. Slight
or moderate, becoming rough. Occasional rain. Good occasionally poor.