Re: [DNSOP] Interim Meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761

str4d <str4d@i2pmail.org> Thu, 09 April 2015 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <str4d@i2pmail.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870191B2B4A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.242
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.242 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NbBRr90luvlG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail01.sigterm.no (unknown [193.150.121.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FEDA1B2B43 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.postman.i2p (unknown [193.150.121.26]) by postman.meeh.i2p (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671D62E10A6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 04:49:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 on milter.postman.i2p
X-Mailer: smtp.postman.i2p - Official I2P Mailer
From: str4d <str4d@i2pmail.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20150330022211.E63E9AE3F9@smtp.postman.i2p>
In-Reply-To: <20150330022211.E63E9AE3F9@smtp.postman.i2p>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20150409024829.70D59AE3FE@smtp.postman.i2p>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 02:48:29 +0000
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fWUDuR2KgI8Ne-3kA2e28FQQ7Mo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Interim Meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 02:49:07 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Tim Wicinski wrote:
> All,
> 
> As we announced in Dallas, we’ve decided to have a separate
> meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761 topics.   We're planning on 
> scheduling this the week of April 13th; with Thursday, April 16th 
> as an initial choice.

Thanks for planning this :)

As someone who has an interest in this particular meeting but has
never watched or participated in IETF or DNSOP meetings before, how
will this meeting be conducted? How do people choose to watch or
participate? The only information I can find that might be related is
about IEFT interim meetings [0], but there is no scheduled interim
meeting for this topic [1]. Is there another mailing list or website I
should be following for more information?

[0] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim-meetings.html
[1] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim.html

> 
> If folks have any preference for a date, or conflicts with this 
> one, please let us know. We plan on having the meeting at 2pm UTC, 
> which would translate to 4pm CEST, 10am EST, 7am PST, and 11pm
> JST. Other suggestions are also welcome-- no time is perfect for 
> everyone but we’re trying to accommodate the widest range of 
> participants that we can.

I haven't seen any further communication (on this ML) about the
meeting, so I assume the specified date and time is still the case?
Friday would work better for me than Thursday (which I can't do at 2pm
UTC), but I'm just one person.

> 
> We’re working on a detailed agenda but the initial plan is to 
> attempt to address both specific drafts and some of the 
> larger-scale issues we’re seeing around the administration of the 
> special-use domain names registry.

Sounds good. I look forward to seeing these issues nailed down.

str4d

> 
> thanks Tim/Suzanne
> 
> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list
>  DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qwv/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----