Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 06 February 2020 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DCC1200C1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:39:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hGEMB1cG8hwl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A6BB12006D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id c24so4807138qtp.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 07:39:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WsZ2AnEWAzSZGdc3fw9K2F6pCW8DcSQ4ufjpMOr0h4I=; b=rj+k9JqEOBZf9asws06jnAZahVQIc3oHhoAG1NhXkfTFWK9Ubpz8XK5ACTLSLZ8WZ4 a/fhG5j4q7d2Lx9vw2OpZ3SMea2o0UgljLHQFQ+biK/sw5bDC50Bofir3oDrUAwBhLWC NRrUO93RrmaMyrT67sabhtgcYQjjgMTwlMxYompVFNgDLghVVDZ2UA0OfAZ7qFZaFmpW ym3DC7B2lKzzaenIgCY4JwRdxtgnnD8osDLnZY3HBNdRsy5iQQFZbqx/gMWWVISlSbrG 1/O8hs40Uc9l4hKFbmqsTR2447lkoxFAJzKdZ+jN2ADvST3ycWlYc5zdyplVC82O+XtW BWEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WsZ2AnEWAzSZGdc3fw9K2F6pCW8DcSQ4ufjpMOr0h4I=; b=WwVX4JL/OvcPWepOCNYLO6dWWBgKJ2aijEvbvMKNVRhgBTA/CaaP/YRafkpH+oX97f R1kjJG/XH8K0PSXoC8ZWktEgEV23usny9o+ae4XrPqxzysfOSGJnNED+dLI8FNejXFD1 iyvL7aIi+itZuLh02XkfvvW7ZKtQSUHQLCN2NnsIo/d3K726GrSdQFX9df4pELm6zb2o rsPEKrjHFFjrMjqD2lzzl3b/KxD/2OzYuWrCD5OJVANyLUWfWM6g5cTIFeV6o+TXPb1P 2TH/Q156xenaV4WJlJks8LM+b/QftNEfYwMYjY1ARbDu1Jk42RXYznkueLd/4YnbhYPg 2Wsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVAvWU+UWjFp9txIioNKRkx6jRUeeyuzVyx87v086OJG5vM2V3+ fuHvgjRZGtfoqIAA90X1rsVh1+UDmNLmzky+xEx6Cw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQUitzGmpEEUJGV43oiJMIBrambGjkwiqZSpCMr6sTCnCufgc317C88nQL5xhwuRHWD8ve2kUaBwIxJmyZecs=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1e90:: with SMTP id c16mr3095101qtm.265.1581003577862; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 07:39:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157559763911.16433.13149772616705852561.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHw9_iJusBODpYOgmZ7q7mhED7wz9_PsF2nZSYN+DWyUBSVPRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJ2dRkn0+V+Ak1qTX8eP9O4UTdzwx0Af3NDdeHcrhcDAg@mail.gmail.com> <35ed41bb-4b8a-52b3-eed9-e2e248b242f7@isc.org> <CAHw9_iKhDmOM0ek+cVOD3DPBrJPkOHNBE0gdcFYWzPQnAJx=3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_i+A=Eg5acZJfoUJzRzpyRjBX4j=o1uKtus2QurbKj_jpQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+A=Eg5acZJfoUJzRzpyRjBX4j=o1uKtus2QurbKj_jpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:39:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKuJ7boPf_f8bOKtS0eu+2GZvOQGAig5pbASY+-OCfTLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue@ietf.org
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fY3vSZO-oBOfUGbl29cLWU7ty8E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:39:41 -0000

... it's been another 10 days, and I'd really like to get this out the door.

When can expect an update?
W

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:00 AM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
> It's been 2 weeks - just making sure this is still in progress.
> I changed the Datatracker state to "Revised ID needed", so I should
> see it as new when the new version is submitted.
>
>
> W
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:44 AM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:28 AM Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 13/01/2020 14:48, Warren Kumari wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:28 PM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> [ Note: CC list edited ]
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi there authors,
> > > >
> > > > Any idea when you might get a chance to get to address these comments?
> > > > This is a useful document, and I'd like to see it progress.
> > >
> > > Mark is on PTO - hopefully we'll get an update out soon!
> > >
> >
> > Okey dokey, no worries; I just wanted to make y'all were not waiting on me.
> >
> > Please SHOUT LOUDLY once ready to progress.
> >
> >
> > W
> >
> > > Ray
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> > idea in the first place.
> > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> > of pants.
> >    ---maf
>
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf