IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 04 April 2017 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F70129467 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mhMUu_91H1XO for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA91E12702E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.126.148] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v340pcmp056995 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:51:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [169.254.126.148]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 17:51:50 -0700
Message-ID: <3C85C5DB-7F1A-45B7-BE2A-926065F2C266@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn3uPHaGi3zmYmzAkuadjAyPMYGqZ5jHZp=rFo+DMLm7AA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <333CCE99-82E2-44C9-97ED-2222540097ED@gmail.com> <20170401201727.GA5948@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <CAKr6gn3uPHaGi3zmYmzAkuadjAyPMYGqZ5jHZp=rFo+DMLm7AA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/faDzo0kNkQTAh9rRHllhRlZpD9I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 00:51:58 -0000

On 3 Apr 2017, at 17:27, George Michaelson wrote:

> isn't this OBE and it's alt.arpa now?

No.

> Serious question btw. I do not think that this document can proceed
> without significant re-drafting to a 2LD if that is the case.

Are you saying that because of:
    https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2017-2/iab-statement-on-the-registration-of-special-use-names-in-the-arpa-domain/
If so, I suspect you read it wrong. My reading is that the IAB is only 
saying that names that are supposed to act like DNS names (that is, to 
exist in the public DNS) need to be under .arpa. This draft explicitly 
is about non-DNS contexts.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email