IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-fanf-dnsop-rfc2317bis

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 13 January 2016 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925C21A0451 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:55:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ue3juhKLpf0o for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766881A1A9B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z14so175233935igp.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:55:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WDanobIYc3fa17x2PxZUOaeZSAo0yy4yPJ6tpCC5M7g=; b=n/BaYCONcM3sUXY1SHZPyIJxLMa6xLf+TOXDbrHhmbbU+j0XvwuNcWSmtOfY2bff+9 heqowSBRBVPyPeF2a+0OYLLKliwraqEMB/TGlemsb1UjvoZQu8FeCw/jlmumxpNxHUH5 ez924bxSaFD+ASmSXbhj2wh17eP18PuZd/H7En2lgwkMI5OWKWV/l3pM9kAvZQZypyQ9 Y5Nbw4vGeH6E4gy2Z8O1l8ZLx/W66gaAnpDbREX/7oWO628krTQu6AQoq6nIMglA/ydR eCdZfqERCCpmKoFa1i0uDQcpOwZ5B+EA+gOEQFIEnQgGUDVocl5a7Fyf+FsUFhF7Dx+T Sr5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WDanobIYc3fa17x2PxZUOaeZSAo0yy4yPJ6tpCC5M7g=; b=NTLlNtMXHbEMFHAo6Xl7O1p0da9K8p5uwGYK8oPxzyxP0BBb8cR8oXhxTMVYyWvqPs vAVTD6/W9wUSN5wCa3dvxyXQ7OSRosdBmg315IKctkwr9z0YjuSsvVRSPrwUTn/37L3Z Rej8bkU4LOpBmp9Bjvxj7xckW2R53zHkdLkpM4xUCzrwSfjo0ZAKxavthulfyiwOZhBg y0li6HKaCNMQxqHCaahD+Yv+EKyn0sAQuFHOn8/7pgy/lJQwhDBDu10RAc2lh8tFWBQ4 EPrHCv4ICo44S6f4Q4ol9PtIqgJcaV+/xtEOhUD2/UIXAc12IS0bO24UGpfg9sBZhoip qOog==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnko92PX2Zz6assb5ay/FNpVLB0fr3WSXXCRK4mrk1F3qEYS2w12FjUB4RxZ872FYL9Wk/MoGqW8W+M8xNp4yQsoc7e6w==
X-Received: by 10.50.152.8 with SMTP id uu8mr23729862igb.7.1452711350840; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from still.local (50-121-215-241.drr03.clbg.wv.frontiernet.net. [50.121.215.241]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ru8sm8532406igb.2.2016.01.13.10.55.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:55:49 -0800 (PST)
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
References: <566E329D.7010007@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqeR5nVGOnLWQ3CzWKR86===VoXWNsqyas3yJEG5zX2n=Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1601131007410.8365@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAJE_bqc53vizG54TS9yRCfP62EdnzyP=5piDRVKixAWB+_C+kw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <21419a8f-bd89-c385-710f-a6f9252a271b@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:55:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqc53vizG54TS9yRCfP62EdnzyP=5piDRVKixAWB+_C+kw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fcKiLKoiD0uaxIPzJJekHQKTm80>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-fanf-dnsop-rfc2317bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:55:52 -0000


On 1/13/16 12:23 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
> With this understanding I have two followup questions:
>
> - If a document is marked as "Updates <Standards Track RFC>", does it
>   automatically mean its status should be Standards Track, too?

It would go in as "Proposed Standard"


tim

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status