IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] How Slack didn't turn on DNSSEC

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> Wed, 01 December 2021 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2A93A03FE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 06:57:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSf4mVva5s0P for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 06:57:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C9C3A07A2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 06:57:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:1488:fffe:6:9c72:9e46:ccd2:7a81] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:9c72:9e46:ccd2:7a81]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E24CF1409B9; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:57:30 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1638370651; bh=sJxrmJ9RqAbkOo3UnlL/3gdN6fngcEZMLd6nPcPkRDw=; h=Date:To:From; b=ZiBDYeva8rPCZKseGXlHzRL5n+cxF7FCrO0jS4cH0+kZFlHifN1MikbNRzJ2pkHbs 2Z3GBQMS/BnE4hcIQI1iGFA3FcdJva0LR92xhoc6FD8OiWM+zxNzHMBJFLPO51+XeP GuXpx30uzXnSwNaOrrwo4bPR/yml+IVQlZcTjlmU=
Message-ID: <840356c1-fcb5-7043-595b-0719bce8428e@nic.cz>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 15:57:30 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <m1msK9b-0000HrC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <C3D5AC3A-CA5A-4F33-8BDA-DDFADD23649C@isc.org> <5f987ab1-c28a-b169-becf-1c44bdac60f4@nic.cz> <B12FC011-582F-46BC-BDEC-23AB45D33932@isc.org> <7b446404-65ec-99b8-7485-3b4b7204ebb7@nic.cz> <A38653D4-AEF0-4381-A924-80DF9E28D9E6@isc.org>
From: Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <A38653D4-AEF0-4381-A924-80DF9E28D9E6@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fduN5mq6eDTbaPqEQJHwK4bkzdo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] How Slack didn't turn on DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 14:57:42 -0000

On 01/12/2021 15.49, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Black lies is “QNAME NSEC \000.QNAME NSEC RRSIG”.  There is no churn for "black lies”.  Black lies turns NXDOMAIN into NODATA.
>
> "DNS Shotgun" can produce churn of NSEC if you ask for a type that is listed as existing but it doesn’t actually exist.  The NSEC returned is still valid for DNSSEC synthesis.

Oh, I'm sorry; a terminological problem.  I used "black-lies" for the 
overall behavior of Cloudflare auths, as described in that blog 
article.  Maybe we could extend the current terminology draft :-D

(Nit: about random QTYPE attacks, I can't see a point when you leave 
random QNAME attacks undefended.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email