Re: [DNSOP] draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-bit

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Mon, 23 November 2015 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB901A8AEA; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:40:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyaPXBUK8b56; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E451A8A58; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:40:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vkay187 with SMTP id y187so41112350vka.3; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:40:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TYjxbZ2jaT7qgauZ3EwOF0E552Bjsk3EiVP1IOrQrsE=; b=Rj+wHjmCtMsW/FLOrUP8XsKkBpGJzaRkTDCGl0ktFMk1NVSTnzix9WXQUrs+s1+fqM HcAOVkXy9aM6/tUEkiyUqsWfMsmpjOuuSUrszAUuAhWS7+C/6GgTIA8ZWEM42v13+Guo 5m2FUy1YkDwRVZtWtu8lov9aWPPVHEKDgmRExPgpxVuS2gP2Z3TjzZQneJUxd9KKNIAr QRWYec9BFZZ6g2qXIqWvBwCBufTziagsfzG3eDcTDv/mfSjFiOb8ImUZTL4eYlboneI+ 1Ksq5Ja5tqsewN9ENgNoWJ3ZsnmtOlL36c4xxWc6Pc+Bu/mcwaQDF8HZuBwLAYbYJhLY A0sw==
X-Received: by 10.31.11.204 with SMTP id 195mr20328775vkl.23.1448296817015; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:40:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c002:25ee:d836:4a1f:4b0a:ebcc? ([2601:181:c002:25ee:d836:4a1f:4b0a:ebcc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m191sm11323767vkd.24.2015.11.23.08.40.10 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151122140322.GA3048@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:40:11 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0F74D647-7622-43C0-97A6-8D8C08CF2D3A@gmail.com>
References: <92980115C526994FA99FC622DA515DFB12A5D8B9@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <5651A23A.4070304@gnunet.org> <20151122140322.GA3048@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ffbupqB0WGCibl5oUxNFwGIKwpg>
Cc: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-bit@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, "homenet-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <homenet-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org>, Rajesh Gupta <rajesh.gupta@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-bit
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:40:20 -0000

Stephane, Christian,

First-- apologies for being offline much of last week.

On Nov 22, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:08:42PM +0100,
> Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org> wrote 
> a message of 13 lines which said:
> 
>> We have solicited but failed to receive any feedback from the dnsop
>> chairs or list on how to improve/revise the draft. Hence, there are
>> currently no updates.  I continue to await the chairs asking for
>> last call on this.
> 
> It has been said that post-onion drafts won't be considered until
> 6761bis is out <https://www.ietf.org/blog/2015/09/onion/>

Correct. We're not ruling out further consideration of the special-use-p2p draft before that process is complete, but we're definitely seeking a clear direction for the problem statement and possible solutions.

To this end: more review of http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem/ would be most welcome. In particular: what is still missing from our understanding of the problem(s) we're facing here?

> but it did
> not prevented
> <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/> to
> advance: it will be interesting to see how .home is handled.

As far as I know, draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home has not "advanced" anywhere; it's simply been submitted as an internet-draft and briefly discussed on the dnsop mailing list. CC'ing homenet chairs in case they can add anything, but dnsop hasn't acted on it, nor have we been asked to. 



best,
Suzanne