Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt

Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@conundrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DA9120128 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:54:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNBeYdUMwDwr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:54:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA82120120 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:54:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id p18so3109349ljc.6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:54:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TCm6unaDHIjL5eUoLajWrf8oeLiwgzgDuciNM0pJn4s=; b=RLyggBgQBR4Mens9dAg3fCP+3rrwJApI04gE+SORFysLFm4kwIj0oYRcKSk6Kvi/m1 8Z0qjrrqE0TTjtFX/VUamXT9dtY0ZWSCoMCwdrHv7AfmD95PRs8Rb1/x/P+0/L7WlNcI 5ZEJ43jl8YsuMkLehrOxIwfngdZFig/e+TLE9C6/zKU98v8MMjBEOfnq7FQfOQDRdGVx 4dObTXK6luF5hEKe8cXbSvqwM8f3Gs1v9+vWuWGIAQuABsusK7L0+oLDnkX6KLZWnLFj 8Hcq6TwGNIFGfeEWM+5A9Iop1xfUNkGo56v/4/sbgasb6D7jxgNX3ce1p+L2dCDmCiPP 0MuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TCm6unaDHIjL5eUoLajWrf8oeLiwgzgDuciNM0pJn4s=; b=ddhgVAvQCaujv0jZrw7kfGmeok/ZQJHgZ1ZpDim+bEVz07O7kbKJv0dardKcntmQER wClZAfATpB1SSaJ49gYjI2a25GZTQzix5cSu7YyOz+P1pm9B3eGsgRkAJgb24ElRHEAk M8QT1kl4hKMEAguqii0UxJdtEd6b4b+X69Bs8xns7xcchD3G85kBLmdpifl6bkqCzJXs Pcgq7gmrCvXcW2Evtr2I80D38tyCkUDSb7UG1N5yXdAOW2/8WPTG5V+xv+SNQHmwvA4d HvQy0Lna9ibmoVOqZ0wMqUOLmA7uUUNLzWFeTYxnzDzLNOyeJxfzGGAeNc8OF2jQX+Ve TDnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWVWti3/pANDUQAp+N809NJ0oL7dfpZT4uNxdI17FwJ5GEonz8D skQnv8NItvSG4zNH4SrSb+L8j1lgS7B4cKKFTnMfmA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzj3XNFf6wdzzvd/JMEPl5tOKgJCB0rGEyhkBweugc1LlxV17V2dn5EDvuxMFjiZfZOhkZnMe4FPOCHDX5PsPE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7013:: with SMTP id l19mr2354123ljc.201.1573052093805; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:54:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157289952539.13851.12121504796430856747@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAiTEH_t9Tsa_9go4JA=ELED7WcKzuPmCd_qD9nh+Vmicd0GQg@mail.gmail.com> <9f5d6e35-cc67-3057-8db9-3eae40598ace@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <9f5d6e35-cc67-3057-8db9-3eae40598ace@bellis.me.uk>
From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:54:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAiTEH8jurh1oSKMUgnXcu-mJOkDjv7HeX5ZZV_A1qAhP2G6QA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000043ce860596aebb03"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fp7ouxs-BlHWVkqMDRtM857ROpk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 14:54:58 -0000

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 09:38, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On 06/11/2019 13:42, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> > I still have a few comments.  There were a few comments from my review
> > of -13 that weren't responded to in email, and haven't been updated in
> > the text, so I'm repeating them here.
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> We sought advice from one of the Chairs as to whether in his reading
> such a significant restructuring of the document was warranted when only
> one participant was calling for it.
>

I'm not actually calling for a restructuring of the document.  I'm calling
for the structure of the document to be followed.  Cleaning up section 3 by
moving its tests to section 8 and clearly describing non-response problems
instead is just following the existing structure of the document.

I did leave it open for you to restructure the document if you wish, to
actually combine sections 3 and 8.

Perhaps this response will encourage others to speak up about whether they
think either of those things are important changes.  It's possible people
saw my review of -13 and didn't feel the need to comment since someone else
already had.