Re: [DNSOP] [dns-operations] dnsop-any-notimp violates the DNS standards

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Thu, 12 March 2015 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC3F1A700B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0OSnrZ63M4Op for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72D061A1AAE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9B11FCAB2; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 23:09:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41A9160067; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 23:17:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-175-41.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.175.41]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC597160060; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 23:17:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18A42B4B215; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:10:00 +1100 (EST)
To: Michael Graff <Michael.Graff@nominum.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20150312125913.20188.qmail@cr.yp.to> <3D558422-D5DA-4434-BDED-E752BA353358@flame.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:11:57 -0000." <3D558422-D5DA-4434-BDED-E752BA353358@flame.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:09:59 +1100
Message-Id: <20150312231000.F18A42B4B215@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/g1MCvvCvliCdO7LTIglzdQtog_0>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>, "dns-operations@dns-oarc.net" <dns-operations@dns-oarc.net>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dns-operations] dnsop-any-notimp violates the DNS standards
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 23:10:04 -0000

In message <3D558422-D5DA-4434-BDED-E752BA353358@flame.org>rg>, Michael Graff writes:
> What problem are we specifically trying to solve here again?

A non-problem for most of us.

> Michael

If one really wants to reduce the number of packets required with
SMTP processibg just write a RFC that says A and AAAA records should
be returned in the additional section if no MX records exist at the
qname.  This is currently permitted so vendors could do this today.

Alternatively change SMTP processing to not fallback to A / AAAA
on no MX.  Set a date several years out my which all sites that
accept email need to publish a MX record.  This really should have
been done years ago.  Instead we have null-MX to signal that there
isn't a SMTP server.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org