IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 04 April 2017 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A868712941A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXGnzTzW2sPf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8835124234 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 49385 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2017 15:01:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Apr 2017 15:01:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:00:40 -0000
Message-ID: <20170404150040.37399.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: ggm@algebras.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn3uPHaGi3zmYmzAkuadjAyPMYGqZ5jHZp=rFo+DMLm7AA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/g5MIAEb1le1qSfQm901ZFUhdJYA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:01:07 -0000

In article <CAKr6gn3uPHaGi3zmYmzAkuadjAyPMYGqZ5jHZp=rFo+DMLm7AA@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>isn't this OBE and it's alt.arpa now?
>
>Serious question btw. I do not think that this document can proceed
>without significant re-drafting to a 2LD if that is the case.

Like Paul Hoffman, I read the it the opposite way.  The draft says
about as clearly as it can that foo.alt is for names that are handled
completely outside the DNS.  The IAB draft says that foo.arpa is where
you put names that are handled within the DNS but with quirks.  I
don't see any conflict.

I suppose it would be good for the draft to reference the IAB statement to
say that's something else, not what .alt is about.

R's,
John

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status