Re: [DNSOP] Agenda for IETF100

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 10 November 2017 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F5512702E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:28:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GvztZxD3rtPX for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:28:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BDD12EC24 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3yYK7q1L45z5T4; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:28:23 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1510316903; bh=UMKnCSia+qE2ulN1q7nFN21oUrk4mJMZ6kws6dUDEBQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=ELK9sfTme1d5lm2ASLgUoxpqilXgfkIsqitN0tZ/5vN8RA/CT8C8KuD9U/wv8FrpZ dY0ZL9M1I4xNSVoCddfPxtirIdI9IQBKST761B8JlmGwyk99yh4P9ZJYVDPHu/vmjP QAamO3agY4XvvXiDAZpO+U8vZekrbCqvursL44lc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzNUQV1oiq-W; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:28:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:28:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2402:3a80:521:9f87:24ab:802:7ac4:d051] (unknown [42.109.245.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BA5E62D29; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:28:19 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 1BA5E62D29
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15A432)
In-Reply-To: <20171110121600.GA2749@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:58:13 +0530
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EC0E4D2D-E9B1-4A1A-B3D5-24AD672DAFC0@nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+HJyM5aUe4UpmU3vuzjaqOkzvC1+_bpvYd=dv93yzAewg@mail.gmail.com> <20171110121600.GA2749@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/g7H-hCgRihkLP9h2E46FAyoiErU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Agenda for IETF100
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:28:28 -0000

I can summarize ENS for you.

It takes 4 out of 7 geeks to bypass the blockchain in case of emergency, court orders or kneecaps.

According to the presentation held at ICANN60

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 10, 2017, at 17:46, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>; wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:07:54PM -0400,
> tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote 
> a message of 202 lines which said:
> 
>> As you can see, we have time for our Monday Morning slot of 2.5 hours.
>> Because of this, we're currently planning on giving back the Thursday
>> meeting slot.
> 
> Any news on that? The monday session collides with DIN which is really
> unfortunate for me because they talk a lot about name resolution
> (Namecoin, Ethereum Name Service). I may face a hard choice.
> 
> (And thursday collides with CBOR, which is a smaller problem for me.)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop