IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Mon, 13 July 2009 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769D028C375 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.866
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.866 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5gpAwbfKf+w for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.schlyter.se (trinitario.schlyter.se [195.47.254.10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C263A6D6F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (a82-94-105-54.adsl.xs4all.nl [82.94.105.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roy) by mail.schlyter.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEC5E2D499; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:59:47 +0200 (MEST)
Message-Id: <6C166401-DF49-48EA-A69B-C1EAA09EBF05@dnss.ec>
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
To: Antoin Verschuren <Antoin.Verschuren@sidn.nl>
In-Reply-To: <850A39016FA57A4887C0AA3C8085F949F02E00@KAEVS1.SIDN.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:59:46 +0200
References: <C67B83C4.E855%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> <20090710130527.GA17272@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <850A39016FA57A4887C0AA3C8085F949F02E00@KAEVS1.SIDN.local>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:59:25 -0000

On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Antoin Verschuren wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-bounces@ietf.org] On  
>> Behalf Of
>> Stephane Bortzmeyer
>> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
>>
>> Disclaimer: I find the whole idea a very bad one, a violation of
>> network neutrality and certainly a service I would never accept from
>> my ISP.
>
> While I strongly agree with Stephane's sentiment here, I do see some  
> merits in describing why it is a bad idea instead of describing how  
> it should be done with as little problems as possible (but still  
> with problems).

SSAC's Report on DNS Response Modification
http://www.icann.org/en/committees/security/sac032.pdf

IAB Commentary Architectural Concerns on the use of DNS Wildcards
http://www.iab.org/documents/docs/2003-09-20-dns-wildcards.html

Kind regards,

Roy Arends

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email